Md. Sonu @ Sonu Sah @ Samir Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32441 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2013 Thana -ITADHI District- BUXAR ====================================================== Md. Sonu @ Sonu Sah @ Samir Sah, Son of Sultan Sah, @ Sunil Sah, Resident of Village- Nayee Bazar, Opposite Block Office, Police StationBuxar (T), District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Roy, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-08-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in paragraph No.10 of the application.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.25 of 2014, arising out of Itarhi P.S. Case No.113 of 2013, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399, 402 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25(1-b) a/26/35 of the Arms Act. The police has recovered one pistol with magazine, one cartridge and two mobiles from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in jail since 18.09.2013.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32441 of 2016 (3) dt.26-08-2016 2/2 Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner-Md. Soni @ Sonu Sah @ Samir Sah, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional District Judge-I, Buxar, in connection with Sessions Trial No.25 of 2014, arising out of Itarhi P.S. Case No.113 of 2013 subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. mother/father/ wife/son of the petitioner;

(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U T