Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56095/2018disposed

Raj Kumar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-06Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56095 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-250 Year-2017 Thana- NAUGACHIA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Raj Kumar Paswan Son of Jyotish Paswan Resident of Village- Tetri, P.S. Naugachia, District Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Satyendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Naugachiya P.S. Case No. 250 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering the nature of allegation against petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

However, after six months of custody the petitioner would be enlarge on bail by the court below itself on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-IInd, Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur, in connection with Naugachiya P.S. Case No. 250 of 2017 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56095 of 2018(2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T