Dabla Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56587 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2017 Thana- KIUL RAIL P.S. District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Dabla Mandal, S/o Late Kedar Mistry @ Kedar Roy, resident of Pachna Road, Sansar Pokhar, P.S.- Kabaiya, District- Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Parmanand Pd. Nr. Sahi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Anita Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in GRP/Kiul P.S. Case No. 263 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant in her written complaint has stated that while she was travelling in Train No. 12351 in Sleeper Coach No. 6, her Trolley Bag and Purse were stolen away which contained clothes, mobile charger, mobile, ATM Card and cash Rs. 2500/-. FIR is against unknown.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 19.02.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56587 of 2018(2) dt.06-10-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate cum Railway Magistrate, Kiul, in connection with GRP/Kiul P.S. Case No. 263 of 2017, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U