Bhushan Kumar Shahi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56393 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -409 Year- 2018 Thana -AHIYAPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Bhushan Kumar Shahi S/o Raghwendra Prasad Shahi @ Raghwendra Shahi, R/o Vill.- Sahwajpur Salem, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Rita Verma, A.P.P. For the informant : Ms. Kumari Sujata Sinha, Advocate. Mr. Upendra Kumar, Advocate.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 409 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 327, 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of POCSO Act. Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is land dispute between the parties. Petitioner has been implicated in the case due to land dispute. Counsel for the petitioner further submits that matter of land dispute had gone up to Supreme Court and order has been passed in favour of the petitioner. In the written report there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner that he tried to kidnap the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56393 of 2018 (2) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 informant.
Counsel for the informant has appeared and opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur-cum-Special Judge POCSO Act, in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 409 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T