Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5476 of 2022 ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar, Son of Jang Bahadur Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Keshri Nagar, D/35, Ajanta Niketan, Police Station - Patliputra, District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Secretary, Building Construction, Department of Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Chief Engineer (North), Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Superintending Engineer, Building Construction Division, East Champaran, Motihari.

4.

The Executive Engineer, Building Construction Division, Sheohar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sushil Kumar, GP 22 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 18-05-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- "For issuance of an appropriate writ and/or order and/or direction to the respondents for granting extension of time of the project as per agreement bearing agreement bearing agreement no. SBD No. 02/2018-19 for the Construction of Main Building cum Workshop, Principal and Vice Principal Residence, Staff Hostel and Canteen at Chattauna Bishunpur (Piprahi), Sheohar of Woman Industrial Training Centre in the district of Sheohar for the year 2018-2019.

The petitioner also prays for a direction to respondents for payment of 10% cut amounting to Rs.3867599/- in the advance paid

Patna High Court CWJC No.5476 of 2022 dt.18-05-2022 2/2 to the petitioner due to non-extension of time of the aforesaid project."

After the mater was heard for some time, finding the Court not in favour of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that the petitioner shall be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to take recourse to such other alternate remedies, which are otherwise available in accordance with law. Prayer allowed.

It stands clarified that all issues of fact and law are left open to be agitated before the competent authority. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/Sujit AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 20.05.2022 Transmission Date