Ranjeet Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21933 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2023 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== Ranjeet Das Son of Ghutar Das Resident of Village- Bampas Town Deoghar, Police Station and District- Deoghar (Jharkhand) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-03-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 392 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, five unknown miscreants intrude in bank premises, having loaded with rifles and pistols in their hand with a view to commit bank robbery. They also disconnected the CCTV and took out the DVR. In furtherance of they looted Rs. 3,15,520/- along with 479 Gms of gold worth of Rs. 16.23 lacs from the bank.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21933 of 2024(2) dt.20-03-2024 2/2 name of the petitioner has come into light in his self confessional statement made in Chanderamandih P.S. Cae No. 72 of 2023. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Similarly situated other accused person has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 18.12.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 62251 of 2023. He is languishing in judicial custody since 18.05.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.1st Class, Jamui in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 132 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U