Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20733/2025rejected

Kailu Paswan @ Manoj Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-20Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20733 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-482 Year-2021 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya ====================================================== Kailu Paswan @ Manoj Paswan Son of Jamuna Paswan R/o village- Pindra Kala, Ps- Hunterganj, Dist- Chatra Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-06-2025 Heard Mr.Arvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Pradeep Narain Kumar, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 05.04.2024 in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 482 of 2021, F.I.R. dated 08.08.2021 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is of looting the informant's Honda Amaze Car bearing Registration No.UP6SET-9861.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20733 of 2025(4) dt.20-06-2025 2/2 alleged in the FIR. Petitioner is in custody since 05.04.2024 and till date no TIP has been conducted by the prosecution.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that although the name of the petitioner has been transpired in this case only on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused person, namely, Vivek Yadav and apart from that, the petitioner has confessed his guilt in the present occurrence and other looted motorcycles have been recovered from possession of the petitioner and other co-accused persons. Further submits that the petitioner carries twelve more cases other than the present one.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 482 of 2021 pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Sherghati, Gaya.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T