Hakim Baitha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7124 of 2019 ====================================================== Hakim Baitha S/o Late Teti Baitha Resident of Baisa (Pipra Baisa) P.S. Parbatta, District- Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Collector - cum- District Magistrate Khagaria. 3.

The Land Reforms Deputy Collector Khagaria.

4.

The Sub- Divisional officer Gogri, district- Khagaria. 5.

The Circle Officer Parbatta District- Khagaria. 6.

The Officer-in- Charge Parbatta District- Khagaria. 7.

Md. Manjurul Haque S/o Abdul Ali Resident of Farkiya P.S. Parbatta District- Khagaria.

8.

Md. Mahirul Haque S/o Mojahirul Haque Resident of Pipra Lateef P.S. Parbatta District- Khagaria.

9.

Bholi Mandal S/o Rambhaju Mandal Resident of Baisa P.S. Parbatta District- Khagaria.

10.

Kishore Kumar Son of Late Tanuk Lal Mandal Resident of Baisa, P.S. Parbatta District- Khagaria.

11.

Shambhu Prasad Son of Late Tanuk Lal Mandal Resident of Baisa, P.S. Parbatta District- Khagaria.

12.

Shashi Bhushan Prasad Son of Late Tanuk Lal Mandal Resident of Baisa, P.S. Parbatta District- Khagaria.

13.

Mritunjay kumar Son of Late Tanuk Lal Mandal Resident of Baisa, P.S. Parbatta District- Khagaria.

14.

Smt. Meena Devi Wife of Umakant Chaurasia Resident of Baisa, DistrictKhagaria. 15.

Babli Devi Wife of Mithlesh Das Resident of Baisa, P.S. Parbatta DistrictKhagaria. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shambhu Sharan Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha (SC-19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 09-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7124 of 2019(2) dt.09-04-2019 2/2 Having regard to the statutory provisions of appeal under Section 11 of Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act against the order passed by the Circle Officer, the court is not inclined to entertain the present application. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in terms of Section 11 of the Act.

With the aforesaid, the present writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mdrashid/- U