Bindu Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16917 of 2014 ====================================================== 1.
Bindu Devi wife of Anil Kumar Gupta resident of village- Balibagh, New Basti Ghusakpur Bettiah, District- West Champaran, Sl. No. 89 2.
Rina Kumari wife of Harendra Mahto, resident of Mauza- Hardiya Sinwara Tola, P.O.- Barwasina, District- West Champaran, Sl. No. 68 3.
Bindu Kumari, wife of Bhagwan Prasad of village and P.O.- Bashaw, P.S.- Bashantpur, District- Siwan, Sl. No. 8 4.
Priya Kumari D/o Ramchand Paswan, of village- Baikunthwa, P.O. Khhada Kunjadhi, P.S. Nautan, District- West Champaran, Sl. No. 98 5.
Chanda Kumari D/o Hira Ravi Ram of Village- Vijaynagar, Lillpati, P.O. Bhadda Kiyalahi, P.S.- Nautan, District- West Champaran, Sl. No. 111 6.
Preeti Gupta wife of Prabhat Gupta of Village- Station Chowk Gandak Road, Bettiah, District- West Champaran, Sl. No. 10 7.
Lalita Kumari D/o Jagdeo Sharma of Village Tikachha Par, Tirhutia Tola, P.O.- Brindawan Ashram, P.S.- Chanpatia, District- West Champaran, Sl. No. 80 8.
Nisha Kumari wife of Santeshwar Kumar, resident of village- Khap Tola, P.O.- Khap Tola, P.S.- Nautan, District- West Champaran 9.
Vinita Kumari wife of Bivesh Kumar, resident of village- Kataiya Bishunpur, P.O.- Kataiya Bishunpura, P.O.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran 10.
Guriya Rani wife of Prabhat Ram, resident of village- Manachak, P.O.- Majhouliya, P.S.- Majhaulia, District- West Champaran 11.
Nirmala Kumari Daughter of Ganesh Prasad, resident of village- Chariya Tola, P.O.- Baikunthwa, P.S.- Nautan, District- West Champaran 12.
Anita Kumari, D/o Mahanth Ram, resident of village- Jhakhara, P.O.- Jhakhara, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- West Champaran 13.
Jyoti Kumari Daughter of Rajendra Prasad, resident of village- Piunibagh, Ward No. 32, P.O.- Belbagh, P.S.- Bettiah, District- West Champaran 14.
Uma Kumari D/O Ramprit Prasad, resident of village- Machharganwa, P.S.- Machharganwa, P.S.- Yogapatti, District- West Champaran 15.
Mamta Kumari wife of Ajeet Kumar, resident of village- Jayshree Bigha, P.O.- Dona, P.S.- Hisuwa, District- Nawada 16.
Rina Kumari wife of Sanjay Kumar, resident of village- Brahmasthan, P.O.- Rukhai, P.S.- Chandi, District- Nalanda 17.
Mitu Kumari wife of Sunil Dubey, resident of village- Barbat Sena, P.S.- Manjhawalia, District- West Champaran ... Petitioners
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
The Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.
The Director, State Health Samittee, Bihar, Patna
Patna High Court CWJC No.16917 of 2014(5) dt.09-01-2023 2/3 4.
The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Member Secretary, District Health Samittee, West Champaran, at Bettiah ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Suresh Prasad Sharma, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Alok Kumar Rai, AC to AAG IV ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA ORAL ORDER 09-01-2023 Heard the parties.
The petitioner by way of this writ petition assails the order of the respondents to not releasing the difference of honorarium which was enhanced to Rs.11,500/- from Rs. 8,000/- from the date of joining as A.N.M.
The counter affidavit has been filed wherein it is stated that the petitioner is receiving honorarium of Rs.8000/- per month from the date of joining but vide letter no. 604 dated 11.03.2013 their appointments were cancelled as the certificates were found to have been issued by the institution which were not duly registered with the Bihar Nursing Registration Council. The counter affidavit is wholly evasive with regard to the fact that the honorarium which was required to be paid was Rs.11,500/-.
Learned counsel submits that the petitioners have worked from March 2010 to 11.03.2013. However, there is no document to show that the honorarium was increased from Rs.8,000/- to Rs.11,500/-.
Patna High Court CWJC No.16917 of 2014(5) dt.09-01-2023 3/3 In view thereof, the claim of the petitioners is not made out. The writ petition is misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Sanjeev Prakash Sharma, J) Shamshad/- Item No. 50 U