Md. Tarique Anwar v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6312 of 2024 ====================================================== Md. Tarique Anwar Son of Md. Mazhar Hasan Ansari Resident of MohallaBoondabigha, P.O.-Kurmawan, Police Station-Barachatti, District-Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary General, Ministry of Railway, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.

2.

The Managing Director, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, A Govt. of India (Ministry of Railways) Enterprise, 5th Floor, Supreme Court Metro Station Building Complex, New Delhi-110001. 3.

The General Manager (H.R.), Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, A Govt. of India (Ministry of Railways) Enterprise, 5th Floor, Supreme Court Metro Station Building Complex, New Delhi-110001. 4.

The Chief General Manager, Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, Manas Nagar, Pandit Deen Dayal Upadhyay, Mughalsarai, District-Chandauli (U.P.)-232101.

5.

The Deputy Project Manager (Civil), Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, Near G.R.P., Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Sasaram)-821115.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akash Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the UOI :

Mr. Brajesh Kumar Pandey, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 26-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "(A) For issuance of a direction, order or writ, to the concerned respondent authorities to quash column 8.3 (b) (ii) of the circular no. 640/2020 dated 16.10.2020 (Annexure-P4) issued by the Dedicated Freight Corridor Corporation of India Limited, A Govt. of India (Ministry of Railways) Enterprise.

(B) For issuance of a direction, order or writ to

Patna High Court CWJC No.6312 of 2024(2) dt.26-04-2024 2/2 the respondent authorities to promote the petitioner from JPM / Civil (E2) to APM / Civil (E3) of the date of promotion of the other similar employees with consequential benefits."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievance. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U