Girja Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44578 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Girja Ram Son of Nageshwar Ram, R/o Village- Lakhapur, P.S.- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Lal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 27-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Mahila (Jehanabad) P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-354A, 354 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner that he attempted to commit illegal act with the informant. It has further been submitted that now good sense has prevailed and both parties have compromised the matter. Counsel for opposite party No. 2 has appeared and submitted that now good sense has prevailed between the parties.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44578 of 2017 (4) dt.27-11-2017 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mahila (Jehanabad) P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017 to the satisfaction of Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, Additional District & Sessions Judge-I, Jehanabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions
(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T