Raj Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18557 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2022 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Raj Kumar Ram Son of Hridyanand Ram Resident of Village - Koini Paschim Tola, P.S. - Manjhagarh, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Naresh Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 02-04-2025 Heard Mr.Naresh Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Manjhagarh P.S.Case No.01 of 2022,FIR dated 02.01.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341,323,307,354,379,504,506/34 of IPC.

3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he hit the informant on her head with Farsa and cut her head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. There is case and counter

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18557 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/3 case. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted to the informant but the injury report of the informant suggests that although she has received the injury but all the injuries inflicted upon the informant are simple in nature caused by hard and blunt object.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioner has clean antecedent and injury inflicted upon the informant (injured person) is simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S.Case No.01 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ Section 482(2) of BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18557 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/3 on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his/her criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T