Pankaj Jaiswal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20395 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2021 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

Pankaj Jaiswal S/O Late Harihar Jaiswal Resident Of Village- Kudra, P.S.- Kudra, District- Kaimur At Bhabua.

2.

Anuj Jaiswal S/O Late Harihar Jaiswal Resident Of Village- Kudra, P.S.- Kudra, District- Kaimur At Bhabua.

3.

Rakesh Jaiswal S/O Atma Jaiswal Resident Of Village- Kudra, P.S.- Kudra, District- Kaimur At Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Uday Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 326, 307, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the brother of the informant by means of lathi, danda and sword as a result of which he sustained serious injuries.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20395 of 2022(3) dt.20-09-2022 2/2 the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both sides have sustained injury. He submits that the injury found upon the victim is simple in nature. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 270 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T