Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Bhim Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36347 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2013 Thana -RAMGARH District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Singh @ Bhim Singh, son of Yadu Rai Singh resident of village - Labedahan, Police Station - Ramgarh, District - Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amrendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No.100 of 2013, registered under Sections 17, 18, 21, 20(B)(II)C, 27(A) of NDPS Act, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge-1st-cum-Special Judge, Kaimur. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected thrice by this Court, lastly on 02.12.2015 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 51817 of 2015, on merit. The petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2013, but the trial has not been concluded as yet. The report as called for vide order dated 21.09.2016 has been received from the court of Addl. Sessions Judge-I,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36347 of 2016 (3) dt.19-10-2016 2/2 Bhabua at Kaimur vide letter No. 93, dated 26.09.2016 which shows that out of 17 Chargesheet witnesses, 07 witnesses have already been examined in this case and remaining witnesses would be examined within six months.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to reconsider the bail prayer of the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is rejected. However, the learned Court below is directed to take all effective stapes to conclude the trial of the petitioner within one year. If the trial of the petitioner is not concluded within one year, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T