← Library
Patna High Court/26315/2023rejected

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-19Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26315 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-606 Year-2022 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR SON OF RAJKUMAR TATWA R/O MOHALLA- HUSE CHAPRA, P.S.- CHAPRA TOWN, DISTRICT- SARAN AT CHAPRA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 15.11.2022 in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S.Case No.606 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 17.08.2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 394 of IPC.

3. The FIR of the occurrence of loot is against unknown.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has been transpired during investigation on the basis of the disclosure made by the spy. Further submits that all the looted amount have been recovered from possession of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26315 of 2023(3) dt.19-07-2023 2/2 petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same is belong to the father of the petitioner.

5. Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the petitioner carries four more cases other than the present one, as mentioned in para-3 of the bail petition, and entire looted amount recovered from the house of petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, all the looted amount have been recovered from possession of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S.Case No.606 of 2022 pending in the court of learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra.

7. Prayer is refused.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T