Chandan Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18155 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-597 Year-2015 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Chandan Kumar Yadav Son of Sri Ramnaresh Yadav @ Ramnaresh Rai Resident of Village - Senduari Gajsingh, P.S. - Motipur, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Rajesh Kumar Das Son of Sri Nawal Kishor Singh (Chela Late Shashi Bhushan Das) Resident of Mohalla - Akharaghat Road, Ram Janki Mandir (Saryug Das Mandir), Post - Head Post Office, P.S. - Town, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jai Prakash Verma, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Ahmad Ali, APP Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh, Adv.for OP-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a complaint case punishable for the offence under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and for this, the petitioner offered to pay Rs. 31,000/- (Rupees thirty one thousand) in three installments, as full and final settlement amount and opposite party no. 2 has accepted the offer and gave his consent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18155 of 2025(4) dt.05-08-2025 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute and confirms the fact regarding settlement entered into between the parties.
5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.
6. Considering the fact that dispute between the parties has been resolved, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is allowed.
7. Let the petitioner, as named above, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Muzaffarpur (East) in connection with Complaint Case No. 597 of 2015, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with further condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18155 of 2025(4) dt.05-08-2025 3/3 learned Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of the petitioner.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) anay U T