Dillu Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No 22199 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2023 Thana- KADWA District- Katihar ====================================================== Dillu Kumar Choudhary son of Jaggu Choudhary R/o- Bara Jitwabari Chanan Ps- Sahebganj Dist- Sahebganj Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case of loot by the Investigating Officer based on confessional statement of apprehended accused in police custody as the informant alleges that while he was returning home after selling sweets, he was intercepted by unknown accused persons who looted cash of Rs 17,000/- along with other articles as detailed in the FIR. The learned counsel further submits that FIR was against three
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22199 of 2024(2) dt.18-04-2024 2/2 unknown accused and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of apprehended accused in police custody which does not have any evidentiary value. 4 The learned APP has opposed the anticipatory bail and submits that the petitioner, in the instant anticipatory bail application, has not even disclosed about his profession which amply suggests that he is indulging in such type of offence and the investigation of the case is still going on. 5 Considering the submission made by the learned APP for the State, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) M.E.H./- U T