← Library
Patna High CourtL.P.A/266/2021withdrawn

Syed Asghar Ali v. The State Of Bihar

2021-10-21The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice Rajan Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.266 of 2021 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8131 of 2020 ====================================================== Syed Asghar Ali, Son of Late Syed Mohammad Mehdi, resident of Badshah Manzil, Guzri Bazar, Patna City, P.S. Khaje- Kalan, Patna City, District - Patna - 800008.

... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Principal Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat Department, Old Secretariat, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Divisional Commissioner, Magadh Division, Gaya. 6.

The Collector -cum-District Magistrate, Nawada. 7.

The Deputy Collector Land Reforms (DCLR), Nawada. 8.

The Circle Officer, Sadar Nawada, District - Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr. Shahabuddin Azeen @ S. Azeen, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Md. Nadeem Seraj, GP-5 Mr. Shailesh Kumar, AC to GP-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 21-10-2021 The appellant has prayed for the following relief/s : - "That the present memo of appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 18.02.2021 passed in CWJC No. 8131 of 2020 by the learned single Judge whereby and whereunder, the writ petition was disposed off with the

Patna High Court L.P.A No.266 of 2021(2) dt.21-10-2021 2/2 directions as stated in paragraph no.5 of the impugned order that "Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter be disposed off with liberty to move before the court below for effective implementation of the decree itself in his favour with regard to the lands in question."

After the matter was heard for some time, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal reserving liberty to seek review of the impugned order.

Permission granted.

Appeal stands disposed of with liberty aforesaid. Interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. (Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( Rajan Gupta, J) Sujit/Ashwini U