Randheer Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.35355 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -236 Year- 2016 Thana -BIHTA District- PATNA ====================================================== Randheer Kumar, S/o Late Lootan Yadav, resident of village- Mahadeo Asthan, Bihta, Police Station- Bihta, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivek Anand Kumar & Mrs. Usha Kiran Hazari, Advocates For the State : Mr. J.N. Thakur, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Petitioner is languishing in custody since 06.04.2016 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20, 22, 27 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.
The prosecution case is that from the possession of the petitioner 51 G.m charas, tobacco and cigarettes were recovered.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that recovery is of small quantity. On earlier point of time the petitioner is accused in one other case i.e. Bihta P.S. Case No. 292 of 2006, arising out of Special Case No. 61 of 2006 under Section 20 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, wherein the petitioner is on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35355 of 2016 (2) dt.18-08-2016 bail. Statement to that effect has been made in para-3 of the petition.
Mr. J.N. Thakur, learned counsel for the State does not controvert the quantity of recovery. Considering the small quantity of recovery, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Patna in connection with Bihta Police Station Case No. 236 of 2016, arising out of Special Case No. 8 of 2016.
The learned court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if he substantially gets involved in similar nature of the offence, or if he defaults for two consecutive occasions.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K./- U T