← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/9041/2021disposed

Rabina Kumari v. The State Of Biahr Through The Principal Secretary,

2022-02-16Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9041 of 2021 ====================================================== Rabina Kumari Daughter of Arun Kumar, Wife of Lalit Narain, Resident of Village - Jagwan (West) Chaphi, Ward No. 2, P.S. - Bisfi Patauna O.P. District- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Biahr through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director, The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Social Welfare Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. (herein after referred to as ICDS).

3.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

4.

The District Programme Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The Child Development Project Officer, Bisfi, District- Madhubani. (herein after referred to as C.D.P.O.).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kripa Nand Jha For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Lalit Kishore (AG) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-02-2022 The matter has been heard via video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Learned counsel for the State accepts notice for respondents.

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:

"(i) For issuance of an appropriate direction, order or writ in the nature

Patna High Court CWJC No.9041 of 2021 dt.16-02-2022 2/3 of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to issue selection letter in favour of the petitioner who was duly selected on the post of Anganwari Sevika at Ward No.2, Centre No. 262, namely Jagwan West after completing the entire exercise for selection to the said post under Bisfi Block of Madhubani District.

(ii) For holding and declaring that the petitioner cannot be denied the selection letter for the post of Sevika after her valid selection without any valid or cogent reason.

(iii) For any other relief/reliefs to which the petitioner may be found entitled to, in the facts and circumstances of the case."

Despite petitioner's grievance which is stated to be pending before respondent no.3/respondent no.4, consequential order has not been passed, therefore, whoever the competent

Patna High Court CWJC No.9041 of 2021 dt.16-02-2022 3/3 authority is hereby directed to redress the grievance of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order failing which the petitioner is entitled to litigation cost and it is quantified at Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand). With the above observation, writ petition stands disposed of.

(P. B. Bajanthri, J) Ankit/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 22.02.2022 Transmission Date NA