Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17089/2020bail granted

Sudhir Kumar Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2020-05-13Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17089 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2020 Thana- PUSA District- Samastipur ====================================================== SUDHIR KUMAR RAI, Son of Rajendra Rai @ Rajendra Ray, resident of village - Malikaur, P.S. Pusa, District Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-05-2020 This matter is taken up through video conferencing. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Liquor was allegedly recovered from possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 20.02.2020. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Investigation of the case is already complete against the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case aforesaid, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Pusa

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17089 of 2020(2) dt.13-05-2020 2/2 Police Station Case No. 17 of 2020, subject to the following conditions:- (a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner. (b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

If the petitioner would not be able to furnish sureties due to lock-down, he shall be provisionally released on his personal bond and the provisional bail shall be confirmed only after production of the bailors within fifteen days of restoration of normal function of the Court.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Kundan/- U T