Surendra Prasad And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9446 of 2013 ===========================================================
1. Surendra Prasad Son of Sri Lalmuni Ram resident of village- Bhekas, P.O.- Akhalaspur, District- Kaimur
2. Manoj Kumar Sinha Son Of Sri Yamuna Lal Professor Colony, Ward No. 4, At And P.O.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
3. Lakshami Narayan Paswan Son Of Sri Jagropan Paswan resident of villageSamhuta, Sadokhar, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas
4. Sunil Kumar Paswan Son Of Sri Ram Lal Paswan resident of village- Karma, P.O.- Mahuari, P.S.- Sonhan District- Kaimur
5. Ram Kuar Ram Son Of Late Jhuri Ram resident of village- Dumdum, P.O. And P.S.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
6. Prameela Kumari Daughter Of Sri Mithai Lal Ram resident of mohallaAmbedkar Nagar, Ward No.- 14, At And P.O.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
7. Satish Kumar Pandey Son Of Late Jagdish Pandey resident of villageSukharipur, P.O. And P.S.- Sonhan, District- Kaimur
8. Janta Devi Wife Of Sri Shiv Murat Shah resident of village And P.O.- Rudrakalan, P.S.- Sonhan, District- Kaimur
9. Ram Chandra Paswan Son Of Sri Dinanath Paswan resident of village- Sonbarsa, P.O.- Khajura, P.S.- Belaon, District- Kaimur
10. Sabita Devi Daughter Of Sri Bajrangi Ram resident of mohalla- Ambedkar Nagar, Ward No. 14, At And P.O.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
11. Md. Tabarak Hussain Son Of Late Md. Sidiqui Ansari resident of mohallaWard No. 23, At And P.O.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
12. Anil Kumar Singh Son Of Sri Rajendra Prasad resident of village- Chhotaka Katara, P.O.- Mujaon, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur
13. Bandhu Kumar Singh Son Of Sri Naresh Singh resident of village- Mokari, P.O. And P.S.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
14. Dharmendra Kumar Son Of Sri Ayodhya Prasad resident of village And P.O.- Mahuari, P.S.- Sonhan, District- Kaimur
15. Md. Sahbub Ahmad Son Of Md. Jaffar Ahmad resident of village- Jorawarpur, P.O.- Baradih, District- Rohtas
16. Surendra Kumar Singh Son Of Sri Bijay Kumar Singh resident of mohallaWard No. 11, At And P.O.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
17. Ajay Kumar Singh Son Of Late Bharat Singh resident of mohalla- Ward No. 11, At And P.O.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
18. Pritam Tiwary Son Of Sri Rama Shankar Tiwari resident of village- Shiaon, P.O. And P.S.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
19. Rajeshwar Prasad Sharma Son Of Late Shivajee Sharma resident of villageShiaon, P.O. And P.S.- Bhabhua, District- Kaimur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary-cum-Commissioner, Department of Health, Bihar, Patna
2. The Director-in-Chief, Health Services, Bihar, Patna
3. The District Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabhua
4. The Civil Surgeon-cum-C.M.O., Kaimur at Bhabhua
5. The Superintendent, Sadar Hospital, Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
6. The Deputy Superintendent, Sadar Hospital, Bhabhua, District- Kaimur
Patna High Court CWJC No.9446 of 2013 dt.18-10-2016 2/3
7. The Deputy Collector I/C, Nazarat, Kaimur Collectorate At Bhabhua, DistrictKaimur
8. The District Welfare Officer, Kaimur, Bhabhua
9. The District Employment Officer, Kaimur, Bhabhua .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajendra Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. J.P. Kishore, AC to SC-13 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
In the present case petitioners are seeking regularisation in service as it has been claimed that they have been working on contract basis for more than five years but have not been regularised in service.
The counsel for the State has filed a counter affidavit where the plea has been taken that as petitioners are the contractual employees, their services were dispensed with and whenever there will be a proper selection, their cases will be considered and benefit of past service will be given to them.
In such view of the matter, the relief that has been sought cannot be given to the petitioners. However, liberty is given to the petitioners that if they are feeling aggrieved by the action of the District Magistrate, they will take action in accordance with law.
Patna High Court CWJC No.9446 of 2013 dt.18-10-2016 3/3 Accordingly, this petition is dismissed.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 19/10/2016 Transmission Date