Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56916/2018bail granted

Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-10-08Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56916 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-126 Year-2018 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Singh S/o Krishnanand Singh, R/o vill.- Kenduar, P.S.- Amarpur, District- Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Amarpur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-A)AA/35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of running a mini gun factory in the premises of his Iron Grill factory. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. It has been further submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the premise from which recovery has been made neither belongs to the petitioner nor he is tenant of the said premises. Petitioner was not arrested at the spot. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 14.05.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56916 of 2018(2) dt.08-10-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-Banka, in connection with Amarpur P.S. Case No. 126 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U