← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16421/2013dismiss for nonprosecution

M/S Sunder And Sons Auto Service Centre v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2024-10-22Justice Smt. G. Anupama Chakravarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16421 of 2013 ====================================================== M/s Sunder And Sons Auto Service Centre S/O Sri Keshar Sao Resident Of Mohalla - L.P. Road, Aurangabad Bazar, P.S. Aurangabad, District - Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Industrial Area Development Commissioner - Cum - Chairman, Bihar Industrial Area Development Author 3.

Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority 6th And 7th Floor, Indira Bhawan, Bailey Road, P.S. Shastri Nagar, District - Patna 4.

M/S Maa Mundheswari Agro Mills Pvt. Ltd. Through Gopalsharan Singh, Lkshman Bigha Behind Aurangabad ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the BIADA :

Mr.Gyan Shankar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.J.K.Roy No.1, SC-13 :

Mr.B.B.Prasad, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-10-2024

1. The matter is being listed from time to time. On 09.04.2024, at the request of the petitioner as a last indulgence it was directed to be posted on 30.09.2024. On 30.09.2024 also, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore it was directed to be listed on 01.10.2024. On 01.10.2024, it was reported by Shri Praveen Kumar Thakur, Advocate that Senior Counsel Shri Kamala Kant Upadhyay who is Advocate On

Patna High Court CWJC No.16421 of 2013(26) dt.22-10-2024 2/2 Record is suffering with viral fever, therefore sought for an adjournment. In spite of posting the matter as a last indulgence twice, again an adjournment was sought and this Court adjourned the case with the rider that no further adjournment shall be granted. It was directed to be listed on 22.10.2024.

2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution. (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J) vinita/- U