Md. Azimuddin @ Ajimuddin v. The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.324 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-101 Year-1995 Thana- RAGHOPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== MD. AZIMUDDIN @ AJIMUDDIN Son of Late hazilal Mohammad Resident of Village- Gaddi, P.S.- Raghopur, Dist.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA Bihar 2.

The State Sentence Remission Board, through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Govt. of Biha Patna., Bihar 3.

The Joint Secretary cum Director (Administration), Home Department (Prison), Bihar Patna. Bihar 4.

The Secretary, Law Department, Bihar, Patna. Bihar 5.

The Additional Director General of police, Criminal Investigation Department, Bihar, Patna. Bihar 6.

The Inspector General, Jail and reforms Services, Bihar, Patna. Bihar 7.

The Assistant Inspector General, jail and Reforms Services Bihar, Patna. Bihar 8.

The Principal Probation Officer, Supaul. Bihar 9.

The Superintendent of Police, Supaul. Bihar 10.

The jail Superintendent, Supaul. Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ansul, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Iqbal Asif Niazi, AC to GP 5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 22-11-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of this application, the matter relating to premature release of the petitioner was considered by the Remission Board and the same has been rejected vide order dated 27.8.2021 which has been brought on record as Annexure-

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.324 of 2020(24) dt.22-11-2021 2/2 A to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no.6. In view of the above, the instant application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said order dated 27.8.2021 if so advised, by filing a separate application.

This application stands disposed of.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U