Ram Pavitra Rai @ Ram Pavitra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22160 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-458 Year-2023 Thana- BOCHAHAN District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ram Pavitra Rai @ Ram Pavitra Ray Son Of Late Jagdeo Rai @ Late Jagdev Ray Resident Of Village - Balthi Rasulpur, P.S. - Bochahan, District - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shambhoo Kumar Suman, Advocate Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate Mr. Manish Kumar No. 13, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Ratneshwar Prasad, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 458 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 447, 325, 307, 379, 354B, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section. 3.

Prosecution case in short is that petitioner along with other named accused persons have assaulted the informant as well as his family members by various means.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22160 of 2024(2) dt.01-04-2024 2/3 4.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 09-01-2024. Petitioner is stated to be man of clean antecedent.

5.

It has been further submitted by the petitioner's counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is submitted that there is subsisting land dispute between the parties. So far has injury sustained by the informant is concerned, it is found to be grievous in nature and caused by hard and blunt substance, but it is alleged that petitioner has assaulted by means of farsa, which is sharp cutting weapon. There is case and counter case between the parties. It is lastly submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted in this case.

6.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 7.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner and charge sheet being submitted, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22160 of 2024(2) dt.01-04-2024 3/3 Court below/concerned Court in connection with Bochahan P.S. Case No. 458 of 2023.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Kishore/- U T