← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./35979/2016bail granted

Laxman Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-20The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35979 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2016 Thana -SONBERSA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Laxman Paswan son of Anup Paswan, Resident of Muzaulia P.S. Bela District Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Arif, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 20-08-2016 This is an application, made under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, seeking bail for the accusedpetitioner, namely, Laxman Paswan, in connection with Sonbarsa Police Station Case No. 94 of 2016, under Sections 272/273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a) Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016.

Perused the above application and materials on record.

Heard Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Md. Arif, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing on behalf of the State.

In view of the fact that the accused above-named has been in custody since 17.05.2016 in connection with the case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35979 of 2016 (2) dt.20-08-2016 2/2 aforementioned and perusal of the materials available does not reveal such incriminating materials, which would warrant further detention of the accused-petitioner in custody, and in view also of the fact that the perusal of the materials does not reveal that the accused-petitioner's liberty on bail would adversely affect his trial, it is, in the interest of justice, hereby directed that the accused above-named shall be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, each of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, in connection with Sonbarsa Police Station Case No. 94 of 2016.

This direction for bail is further subject to the condition that the accused above-named shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence and shall appear, in the learned Court below, as may be directed.

In terms of the above observations and directions, this bail application shall stand disposed of.

(I.A. Ansari,CJ) Mkr./- U T