Shiv Nandan Prashad v. Sri Dayanidhan Panday, The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.921 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6524 of 2020 ====================================================== 1.

Shiv Nandan Prashad S/o Mahesh Mahto near Isha I.T.I., Khankhura Tarwana, P.O.-R.S., Gaya, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya. 2.

Harinandan Prashad, S/o Mahesh Mahto, near Isha I.T.I., Khankhura Tarwana, P.O.-R.S., Gaya, P.S.- Delha, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Sri Dayanidhan Panday, The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Land Reforms and Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Dr. Thiyagranjan S.M., The District Magistrate, Gaya. 3.

Rabindra Ram, The District Land Acquisition Officer, Gaya. 4.

Krislay Srivastwa, The Sub Divisional Officer, Gaya Sadar, Gaya. 5.

Rishikesh Kumar, The Circle Officer, Gaya Sadar, Gaya. 6.

Arti Singh, The Principal Secretary, Indian Railway, Govt. of India. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vishwa Ranjan Choudhary, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Navnit Kumar, AC to GP- 18 For the Railway :

Mr. Brajesh Kumar Pandey, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 31-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners filed the instant application alleging violation of the directions contained in order dated 11.5.2023 passed in C.W.J.C. no. 6524 of 2020.

3. The contention of learned counsel for the opposite parties that the directions contained in the order have been complied with and the payments made, on having received instructions is not denied by learned counsel for the petitioners.

Patna High Court MJC No.921 of 2024(8) dt.31-10-2025 2/2

4. In view of the above, the application stands disposed off.

(Partha Sarthy, J) sauravkrsinha/- U