Aneeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12169 of 2013 ====================================================== Aneeta Devi Wife Of Rajeshwar Mishra Resident Of Purkhauli Visara, P.S. : Lalganj, District : Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Bihar at Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Deptt. Of Panchayati Raj, Bihar At Patna

3. The Collector, Vaishali

4. The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali

5. The Panchayati Raj Officer, Vaishali

6. The Sub Divisional Officer, Lalganj, Vaishali

7. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Lalganj, Vaishali

8. The Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Purkhauli, Vaishali

9. The Anchal Adhikari, Purkhauli, Vaishali

10. The Station House Officer, Purkhauli, P.S. Vaishali .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 02-03-2016 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

Heard the counsel for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondents to construct Angan Bari Kendra at another suitable place and not at the place where it is being constructed. Although relevant facts justifying construction of the Centre at the selected location has been set out in the counter affidavit, but, in my view, no relief as such can be granted to the petitioner. Where the Centre in question shall be constructed, is the administrative decision of the State respondent. The Court is not required to go into the correctness of such decision unless

Patna High Court CWJC No.12169 of 2013 (2) dt.02-03-2016 2/2 some patent illegality is shown which is not the case in hand. The writ application is dismissed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U