Amar Gupta @ Amar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24872 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2021 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

Amar Gupta @ Amar Kumar Son of Ramesh Prasad Resident of Mohalla Durga Sthan, Hilsa, P.S. - Hilsa, District - Nalanda. 2.

Kanchan Devi @ Kanchan Kumari Wife of Amar Gupta @ Amar Kumar Resident of Mohalla Durga Sthan, Hilsa, P.S. - Hilsa, District - Nalanda. 3.

Rupa Gupta Wife of Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh, D/o Ramesh Prasad Resident of Mohalla Durga Sthan, Hilsa, PS Hilsa, District Nalanda. At present residing at 874 Ambedkar Basti, RK Puram, Sector 01, New Delhi, Dist. - South West Delhi, New Delhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Shanker Pankaj For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 308, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant and her husband and snatched her golden neckless, earrings, rings and also Rs. 35,000/- from the packet of her husband.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present case arises out of a property dispute between the parties and the petitioner no. 1 happens to be the full brother of the informant's husband while petitioners no.2 and 3 are the sisters-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24872 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026 2/2 in-law of the informant. It has also been submitted that on account of dispute, a scuffle had taken place between the parties in which the petitioners side was also assaulted. However, the injury report Annexure-P/2 has been pointed out to submit that the injuries are also simple in nature.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for anticipatory bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the general and omnibus nature of allegation coupled with the simple injuries, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hilsa P.S. Case No. 306 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T