Patna High CourtMJC/1900/2015disposed

Ashok Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-12-16Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1900 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3765 of 2015 =========================================================== Ashok Kumar, Son of Ram Khelawan Singh, Resident of Karmalichak, P.O. - Begampur, P.S. -Chowk, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. R.K. Mahajan, The Principal Secretary Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. Ram Bujhawan Choudhary, The Director, Secondary Education Bihar, Patna

4. Mr. Yogesh Chandra Singh, The District Education Officer, Nalanda DistrictNalanda

5. Mr. Safi Ahmad, The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Nalanda District - Nalanda

6. Mr. Safi Ahmad, Drawing and Disbursing Officer, Nalanda

7. Mr. Viswamohan Kumar, The Incharge Principal/Head Master, Govt. High School, Ranabigha, Bihar Sharif, District - Nalanda .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. SC15 A P Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 16-12-2015 The sole petitioner is dead. I. A. No. 8137 of 2015 has been filed for substitution by wife of the petitioner, namely, Smt. Shashi Sinha.

Interlocutory application is allowed.

A show-cause on behalf of O. P. No. 5 has been filed where they have indicated the steps which have been taken in furtherance to the direction issued by this Court in the writ application. They also indicate that a sum of Rs. 14,91,302 /- stands

Patna High Court MJC No.1900 of 2015 dt.16-12-2015 2/2 credited in the account of Smt. Shashi Sinha, wife of Late Ashok Kumar, vide authorization, dated 11.12.2015.

Counsel for the petitioner is neither in a position to certify nor deny Annexure-A. He, however, submits that the actual due is more than 17 lacs of rupees, but only Rs. 14,91,302/- has been credited.

If the petitioner approaches the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nalanda with the accounting, the details of the calculation etc. will be looked into and if any discrepancy is found in the authorization, the balance amount will also be paid to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of such discrepancy having been found.

Contempt application stands disposed off in terms of above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- U