Chandan Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20295 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2020 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Chandan Sah aged about 32 yrs, son of Hari Sah@ Hari Prasad, resident of village- Nimuiya, P.S- Turkauliya, Dist- East Champaran, Motihari ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 25-08-2020 The defect as pointed out by the office be ignored. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S. Case No. 04 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302,120B, 34, 392 of the Indian Penal Code .
There is specific allegation in the first information report against the petitioner that he along with others took the deceased from his house and subsequently, the dead body of deceased was recovered.
Learned counsel of the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case on account of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20295 of 2020(2) dt.25-08-2020 2/2 village politics and as a matter of fact, petitioner does not have any concerned with co-accused Mritunjay Singh@ Chhotu Singh against whom there is some sort of allegation levelled in the written report.
Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submission of the parties, in my view, it is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail and, accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with Pipra Kothi P.S.Case No. 04 of 2020, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari stands rejected. However, this order shall not cause any prejudice to the concerned/ competent court at the time of consideration of regular bail application of the petitioner.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T