Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58782/2018bail granted

Dhiraj Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-27Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58782 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2018 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Dhiraj Kumar Jha, Son of Late Kashi Nath Jha, Resident of VillageNarpatinagar, P.S.- Sakari, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Adv, Ms. Swati Sinha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dinesh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Sakari P.S. Case No. 84 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 419, 420, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of occupying the stolen Car along with other co-accused and after seeing the police party both tried to escape but on chase they were apprehended.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and has nothing to do with the Car. Petitioner is in custody since 15.06.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58782 of 2018(2) dt.27-09-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-Madhubani, in connection with Sakari P.S. Case No. 84 of 2018, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U