Krishna Yadav @ Krishna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20152 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2020 Thana- SANJHOLI District- Rohtas ====================================================== KRISHNA YADAV @ KRISHNA SINGH S/o Late Vishwanath Yadav R/o village- Tandua, P.S.- Sanjhauli, District- Rohtas, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharad Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that while he was going to see his field, he was intercepted by Ramji, Krishna (petitioner), Sukul and Vinay near the shop of one Jawahar Singh, it is next alleged that the accused persons started abusing him and on orders of Krishna, the accused started assaulting him and thereafter Sintoo fired

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20152 of 2022(2) dt.26-09-2022 2/3 causing injury on right eye of Jawahar Lal, Satya fired causing injury on back of Amal and Vinay fired causing injury to Manoj and Pradyuman fired causing injury on right hand of Chhotelal, it is further alleged that Sukul Yadav snatched golden locket worth Rs. 15,000/- and rest of the accused also assaulted by fist.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and from perusal of the allegations as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that there is specific allegation against the accused persons of assaulting the informant and firing but then as far as this petitioner is concerned, against him allegations are general and omnibus in nature. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20152 of 2022(2) dt.26-09-2022 3/3 case is pending/successor court in connection with Sanjhauli P.S. Case No. 81 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T