Ramnath Yadav @ Ajay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20090 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2021 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== RAMNATH YADAV @ AJAY YADAV S/O KISHAN YADAV @ RADHE SHYAM YADAV, R/o village- Naya Tola Juraoganj, P.S.- Kodha, DistrictKatihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivjee Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, App ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 414,467,468,471,420 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-B)A,26,35 of the Arms Act.

As per FIR, one live cartridge was recovered from the possession of the petitioner and from possession of the coaccused, Mukesh Gawala, one pistol and one live cartridge were recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 26.07.2021.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20090 of 2022(2) dt.12-07-2022 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Suryagarha P.S. Case No. 161 of 2021 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T