Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3303/2017dismissed

Bisundeo Chauhan @ Bisundeo @ Bishundeo And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-02Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3303 of 2017 (4) dt.02-03-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3303 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -223 Year- 2016 Thana -PAKARIBARAW District- NAWADA ======================================================

1. Bisundeo Chauhan @ Bisundeo @ Bishundeo, Son of Mangal Chauhan,

2. Ashok Chauhan, Son of Mangal Chauhan, Both resident of VillageAmarpur Beldaria, P.S.- Pakribarawan, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lilawati Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Vinod Shankar Modi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Pakribarawan P.S. Case No. 223 of 2016 instituted for the offence under sections 341, 323, 307, 427, 447, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged in the written report that petitioners with other accused persons assaulted the informant, his wife, Girija Devi, son Pappu Chauhan and daughter Keshri Kumari, causing injury in their heads and legs and other parts of the body and also damaged the door and other house hold articles. The learned A.P.P. has submitted that injured witnesses in paras 3, 4, and 5 have all taken the name of these

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3303 of 2017 (4) dt.02-03-2017 petitioners of assaulting them with khanti and lathi etc. The doctor has found injuries on the person of Girija Devi. The injured has specifically stated that she was assaulted and doctor has found lacerated wound on head and right side parietal region. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the court below and seek regular bail which shall be considered and disposed off on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sanjay Priya, J) Ravi/- U T