Bhikhari Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30116 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2019 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== BHIKHARI SINGH Son of Radhay Singh Resident of Village- Nandpur, P.S.- Suryagarha, District- Lakhisarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-08-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 25(I-B)a and 26 of Arms Act. As per prosecution case, one country made pistol and 39 live cartridges have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.
It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that due to criminal antecedent, petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is in custody since 22.11.2019. Investigation is complete.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30116 of 2021(2) dt.13-08-2021 2/2 Considering the period of custody, this bail application is allowed. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in Suryagarha P.S. Case no. 307/2019 on the following conditions.
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) s.hassan/- U T