Deepak Kumar @ Shasi Raj v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30246 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-311 Year-2020 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== DEEPAK KUMAR @ SHASI RAJ S/o Mithilesh Singh Resident of VillageSanaut, P.S.- Gaya Muffasil, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner prays for grant of bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(I-b)A, 26, 35, 27 of the Arms Act.
As per prosecution case, one country made loaded pistol with two live cartridges and mobile phone have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 05.09.2020. Charge sheet has already been submitted.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30246 of 2021(3) dt.27-09-2021 2/2 Considering the period of custody, this bail application is allowed. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Addl. Sessions Judge XII, Gaya in Sessions Trial no. 43/21/18/2021 arising out of Gaya Mufassil P.S. Case no. 311/2020 on the following conditions.
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) s.hassan/- U T