Reshma Devi @ Rinku v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25030 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2023 Thana- KUDHNI District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Reshma Devi @ Rinku Wife of Munna Singh @ Munna Yadav R/o VillageMugaon, P.S.- Koran Sarai, Dist.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Narsingh Tanti, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 01-05-2024 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Kudhani P.S. Case No.14 of 2023 under Sections 363, 366A, 368 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against two named and two unknown accused persons. The specific allegation against the petitioner is that according to F.I.R., two persons have alleged to kidnap the daughter of the informant and brought the said victim at the house of the petitioner. Subsequently, the petitioner informed in this regard to her husband then her husband contacted with the informant and handed over the victim to him.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25030 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 2/3
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He submits that from the contents of F.I.R., it become very much clear that the petitioner has not played any role in the kidnapping rather the informant's daughter has been kidnapped by two males, but those two persons had brought the victim at the house of the petitioner then her husband had contacted with the informant and his family and handed over the victim to them.
5. Counsel also submits that antecedent of the petitioner is clean. He further submits that the petitioner is a lady and she has not violated any law rather as soon as she got information about wrong done, she has consulted with her husband and helped the alleged victim to brought to her family.
6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
7. In the present facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Mohania, Kaimur at Bhabua in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25030 of 2024(2) dt.01-05-2024 3/3 with Kudhani P.S. Case No.14 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U T