Ajay Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3865 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -56 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- SHEIKHPURA ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Son of Gauri Sao Resident of Mohalla Bichhi Chandak, P.s. Biharisharif, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Sandhiya Devi Wife of Ajay Kumar , daughter of Narayan Sao Resident of Mohalla Budhali, Ward no. 17 P.S. and District Sheikhpura. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rabindra Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sheikhpura (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 56 of 2016 registered under Sections 498A, 323, 307/34 of the I.P.C. and 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the Court of C.J.M., Sheikhpura.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. It is also submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case.

Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner with submission that there is

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3865 of 2017 (3) dt.22-06-2017 2/2 direct allegation of demand and torture with intention to kill her and the mediation also fails. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and nature of the allegation, I am not inclined to allow the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- U T