← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20417/2023bail granted

Vishal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-06-23Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20417 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-394 Year-2022 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran ====================================================== VISHAL KUMAR S/O Lalbabu Sah R/O Mohalla-Mathiya Dih, Ward No. 16, P.S.-Chhatauni, District-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Baidya Nath Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 332, 333, 353 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that one Deva Kumar was arrested and while police was bringing him to the police station when several accused persons including the petitioner along with 100 unknown persons blocked the road and were raising slogans for releasing Deva and when the police tried to pacify the matter they started scuffling with the police. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that only allegation against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20417 of 2023(2) dt.23-06-2023 2/2 this petitioner is of blocking the road, it is next submitted that petitioner was not even present at the place of occurrence and he has been implicated falsely by the police as he has been implicated in rest of the cases.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedent of eight cases.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 394 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T