← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22005/2025bail rejected

Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-02Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22005 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2024 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Pintu Kumar S/O Bharat Singh R/O Village- Kiratpur Rajaram, P.S - Bhagwanpur, District - Vaishali.

2.

Amar Paswan S/O Bharat Singh R/O Village- Kiratpur Rajaram, P.S - Bhagwanpur, District - Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 02-05-2025 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 297 of 2024 lodged on 01.11.2024, for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged by the informant in which it is alleged that his brother went to his Sasural, and during that time the informant received information that his brother has died. When the informant reached there, it has been informed by co-villages that the petitioners have brutally assaulted his brother, due to which he died.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22005 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Counsel further submits that it is unbelievable that a bother and a father could take the life of the husband of their sister/daughter. Counsel further submits that criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean and is ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon him.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioners.

6. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

7. It is directed to the petitioners to surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today. In case, the petitioners surrender within four weeks, then the Trial Court is directed to pass order on his surrender-cum-bail application on the same day without being prejudice that the anticipatory bail of the petitioners have been rejected by this Court and the Trial Court shall pass order on the merit of this case. (Dr. Anshuman, J) anand/- U T