Dukhi Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.58883 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2018 Thana -SRINAGAR DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Dukhi Sah son of Late Ramchandra Sah, resident of Village- Ranha, P.S. Srinagar Pujaha, District- West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Anusuiya Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Srinagar Pujaha P.S. Case No. 57/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 324, 342, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act. Later on, section 307 of the Indian Penal Code was added.

Allegation against petitioner is causing fire-arm injury to the informant and also assaulting him with lathi. Informant sustained injuries all over his body.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nature of injuries is simple. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody since 06.05.2018.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58883 of 2018 (2) dt.09-10-2018 2/2 Considering the facts aforesaid, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail after completion of six months in custody, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Srinagar Pujaha P.S. Case No. 57/2018, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T