Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18891 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2025 Thana- Arwal District- Arwal ====================================================== 1.
Amit Kumar S/O Kaushal Sharma @ Kaushlendra Singh R/O Village- Barki Ahiyapur, P.S. and Distt.- Arwal.
2.
Kaushal Sharma @ Kaushlendra Singh S/O Late Ram Naresh Singh R/O Village- Barki Ahiyapur, P.S. and Distt.- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ramakant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 118(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioners along with two unknown accused came and petitioner no. 1 assaulted his son by khanti causing injury on his palm and thereafter accused persons started pelting bricks and even assaulted his wife and left threatening.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from the side of the petitioners,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18891 of 2026(2) dt.06-04-2026 2/2 Arwal P.S. Case No. 391 of 2025 has been instituted against the informant and his side. It is next submitted that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner no. 2, though petitioner no. 1 is alleged to have assaulted the son of the informant by khanti causing injury on palm but then palm is a non-vital part of the body. It is also submitted that petitioner and the informant are neighbours and are having dispute relating to passage.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 390 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T