← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1002/2020dismissed

Bhim Rao Gautam v. The Patna University

2020-12-02Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1002 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.22571 of 2019 ====================================================== Bhim Rao Gautam Son of Ram Kewal Ram, Resident of Pragati Ansh, House No. 1972, South East of Health Institute, New Patna Colony, P.S. Beur, District- Patna, Bihar- 800002.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Patna University through the Registrar, namely (Col.) Manoj Sinha, Ashok Rajpath, Near Patna College,Patna, Bihar- 800005 2.

The Hon'ble Vice-Chancellor, namely Professor Ras Bihari Prasad Singh, Patna University, Ashok Rajpath, Patna, Bihar-800005 3.

The Pro- Vice Chancellor, namely Professor Dolly Sinha, Patna University, Ashok Rajpath, Patna, Bihar-800005 4.

The Registrar, namely (Col.) Manoj Sinha, Patna University, Ashok Rajpath, Patna, Bihar-800005 5.

The Controller of Examination, namely Dr. R.K. Mandal, Patna University, Ashok Rajpath, Patna, Bihar-800005 6.

The Principal, namely Mohammad Sharif, Patna Law College, Patna University, Mahendru , Rani Ghat, Patna, Bihar-800006 7.

The Hon'ble Chancellor, namely Sri Phagu Chauhan, Raj Bhawan, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Kaushik, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nadim Seraj, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 02-12-2020 Heard Mr. Kumar Kaushik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Nadim Seraj, learned counsel for Patna University through Video Conferencing.

The petitioner has already been allowed to appear at the 3rd Semester examination and thereafter the programme of 2nd Semester has also been issued. The petitioner is allowed to appear at the 2nd Semester Examination. In this view of the fact,

Patna High Court MJC No.1002 of 2020(3) dt.02-12-2020 2/2 no need to proceed further in this contempt petition. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as the order has already been complied with.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Harish/- U