← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19917/2022bail granted

Ghanshyam Das @ Ghanshyam Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

2022-05-16Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19917 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2021 Thana- HASANGANJ District- Katihar ====================================================== GHANSHYAM DAS @ GHANSHYAM KUMAR DAS S/o Srilal Das @ Shrilal Das R/o Village - Pachgachia Bazar, P.S. - Gopalpur, District - Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Neelam Kumar W/o Santosh Kumar Das @ Santosh Kumar R/o Village - Khabuna Chowk, P.S.- Hasanganj, District - Katihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sarita Bajaj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-05-2022 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. Same be kept on the record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 323, 341, 354B, 498A, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19917 of 2022(2) dt.16-05-2022 2/3 It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner is cousin brother-in-law of the victim. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st class, Katihar in connection with Hasanganj P.S. case No.111/2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The petitioner is directed to co-operate during the trial. If the petitioner does not co-operate during the trial, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19917 of 2022(2) dt.16-05-2022 3/3 court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T