Ravindra Rai @ Rabindra Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28814 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2020 Thana- MAHINDWARA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

RAVINDRA RAI @ RABINDRA RAI Son of Laxmi Rai Resident of village - Khanuaghat P.S. - Mahindwara, District- Sitamarhi. 2.

DEEPAK RAI Son of Bablu Rai Resident of village - Khanuaghat P.S. - Mahindwara, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shankar Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties, through through Video Conferencing. Conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Mahindwara P.S. Case No. 112 of 2020, registered for the offence under Section 414 of the IPC and Sections 30(a)(b) (c) (f), 36, 37, 41 of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016. In view of the fact that prima facie a case under the Excise Act, is made out against the petitioner, this application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is not maintainable

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.28814 of 2021(3) dt.11-01-2022 2/2 in view of Full Bench decision of this Court rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar reported in 2019(2) P.L.J.R. 1089 (F.B.).

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as not maintainable.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) sanjeev/- U T