Raj Kumar Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.4731 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -306 Year- 2016 Thana -LAHERIMUHALLA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================
1. Raj Kumar Prasad, Son of Late Ram Chandra Prasad @ Ram Chandra Mahto, Resident of Mohalla- Meharpar, P.S.- Laheri, Bihar Shariphf, District- Nalanda.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-02-2017 Heard the parties.
This application has been filed in connection with Laheri P.S. Case No.306 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the allegation against the petitioner is that he has made some manipulation in the 'Jamabandi' as Khata No.275 but as a matter of fact the aforesaid page was torn as such, the new Jamabandi No.1643 was created, on the basis of that he has also filed information petition before the Circle Officer, who is informant of the case also and he has also stated that the Jamabandi Page No.107 was torn and as such new Jamabandi No.1643 was instituted and as such the whole
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4731 of 2017 (2) dt.13-02-2017 2/2 case is false and concocted against the petitioner. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides. In view of the facts as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Laheri P.S.Case No.306 of 2016 , subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T