Sweeti Devi @ Sipati Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2718 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2016 Thana -FESHAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Sweeti Devi @ Sipati Devi W/O Laldas Singh
2. Sujanti Devi W/O Binod Singh @ Munna Singh
3. Vinod Singh @ Munna Singh
4. Ravi Kumar both sons of Laldas Singh
5. Raju Singh @ Raju Kumar son of Laldas Singh
6. Laldas Singh son of Debnarayan Singh, All resident of Village- Chetan, P.S. Fesar, District- Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned A.P.P. for the State.
In this application for anticipatory bail the petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Fesar P.S. Case No. 41 of 2016 for the offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 504, 355 and 308 of the I.P.C and section 3⁄4 of the Dyne Practices Act. Allegedly, the petitioners started abusing the informant by saying her Dyne and when she protested the petitioner nos. 1 and 2 started assaulting her with feet and fat and when grand daughter Rachna Kumari came for rescue she was also assaulted and then other petitioners claim to assault her and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2718 of 2017 (2) dt.28-01-2017 2/2 when Satendra Singh came for rescue petitioner no.6 ran after taking rod and hit the informant which was stopped by her hand resulting injury in her right palm and thereafter the accused persons fled away.
Submission is of false implication and that there is case and counter case, no injury has been caused to the informant or any one but only with a view to save the skin from the counter case this case has been lodged.
The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for pre-arrest bail of the petitioners.
In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioners, in case of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of. S.D.J.M. Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with above mentioned case, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T