Ram Dayal Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6469 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -95 Year- 2016 Thana -MUSRIGHARARI District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Ram Dayal Singh Son of Mahendra Mahto

2. Raj Kumar Mahto Son of Mahendra Mahot

3. Mahendra Mahto Son of late Prabhu Mahto All residents of VillageHarpur Allouth, Police Station- Surarigharari, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Musarigharari P.S. Case No. 95 of 2016 registered under Section 307 and other allied sections of the I.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is admitted land dispute between the parties. There is case and counter case. Both sides sustained injuries. The allegations levelled are general and omnibus.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6469 of 2017 (5) dt.29-03-2017 2/2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IV, Samastipur in connection with Musarigharari P.S. Case No. 95 of 2016 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Arvind Srivastava, J) Manish/- U T